Photograph shows a big red placard bearing chunky wild-west style serif lettering.  At the top, in yellow, it says: WHY DO YOU ♡ THE DEVIL? Then, in white, two columns: HOMO’S DRUGGIES GANGSTER’S FEMINIST’S MORMON’S BUDDHIST’S DRUNKARD’S BAHI’S CATHOLIC’S WIFEBEATER’S ATHEIST’S NEW AGER’S DEMOCRAT’S ENVIRONMENTALIST’S P.K’S ABORTIONIST’S EFFEMINATE MEN RACIST’S SCIENTOLOGIST’S EMO’S And in the next column: GOVERNMENT RECIPIENT’S ADULTERER’S FORNICATOR’S THIEVE’S GAMBLER’S MUSLIM’S JEHOVAH’S WITNESS’S PERVERT’S IDOLATER’S PAGAN’S LOUD MOUTH WOMEN AGNOSTIC’S LIAR’S FREELOADER’S LIBERAL’S HIGH FULLUTENT SOPHISTICATED SWINE SPORT’S NUT’S Finally, in yellow again: REPENT AND BELIEVE IN JESUS. annabunches: iamwhoiamandidontgiveadamn: (via vegun) I love him cause he’s awesome in the sack!  :)  wait…”sports nuts”?!  really?  I’m really digging the unwarranted apostrophes. I keep waiting for the noun. Or maybe I’m supposed to read it top to bottom (because straight across doesn’t line up)? That would give us “Homo’s druggies”, which is reasonable, grammatically - I know plenty of gay men who have friends that do drugs. On the other side, of interest, we have “Agnostic’s liar’s freeloader’s liberal’s [highfalutin] sophisticated swine”. Much more complicated, even ignoring the phonetic spelling of highfalutin. I knew this one woman - agnostic, but loosely associated with the UU church - whose daughter was a compulsive liar. Her boyfriend was kind of a freeloader, and his parents were pretty liberal. So, I guess they are highfalutin sophisticated swine? That’s odd; I mean, it just doesn’t seem like an accurate description of them. Oh well, I’m sure this nonsensical sign knows best. But what’s a thieve?

Photograph shows a big red placard bearing chunky wild-west style serif lettering.  At the top, in yellow, it says:

WHY DO YOU ♡ THE DEVIL?

Then, in white, two columns:

HOMO’S
DRUGGIES
GANGSTER’S
FEMINIST’S
MORMON’S
BUDDHIST’S
DRUNKARD’S
BAHI’S
CATHOLIC’S
WIFEBEATER’S
ATHEIST’S
NEW AGER’S
DEMOCRAT’S
ENVIRONMENTALIST’S
P.K’S
ABORTIONIST’S
EFFEMINATE MEN
RACIST’S
SCIENTOLOGIST’S
EMO’S

And in the next column:

GOVERNMENT RECIPIENT’S
ADULTERER’S
FORNICATOR’S
THIEVE’S
GAMBLER’S
MUSLIM’S
JEHOVAH’S WITNESS’S
PERVERT’S
IDOLATER’S
PAGAN’S
LOUD MOUTH WOMEN
AGNOSTIC’S
LIAR’S
FREELOADER’S
LIBERAL’S
HIGH FULLUTENT
SOPHISTICATED SWINE
SPORT’S NUT’S

Finally, in yellow again:

REPENT AND BELIEVE IN JESUS.

annabunches:

iamwhoiamandidontgiveadamn:

(via vegun)

I love him cause he’s awesome in the sack!  :) 

wait…”sports nuts”?!  really? 

I’m really digging the unwarranted apostrophes. I keep waiting for the noun.

Or maybe I’m supposed to read it top to bottom (because straight across doesn’t line up)? That would give us “Homo’s druggies”, which is reasonable, grammatically - I know plenty of gay men who have friends that do drugs.

On the other side, of interest, we have “Agnostic’s liar’s freeloader’s liberal’s [highfalutin] sophisticated swine”. Much more complicated, even ignoring the phonetic spelling of highfalutin. I knew this one woman - agnostic, but loosely associated with the UU church - whose daughter was a compulsive liar. Her boyfriend was kind of a freeloader, and his parents were pretty liberal. So, I guess they are highfalutin sophisticated swine? That’s odd; I mean, it just doesn’t seem like an accurate description of them. Oh well, I’m sure this nonsensical sign knows best.

But what’s a thieve?